| 1 |
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 7:25 PM Marc Joliet <marcec@×××.de> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> personally, I care about closing bugs that are done with or |
| 4 |
> can't be acted upon. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
As do I. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> I honestly think it would |
| 9 |
> be best to close bugs that are just not applicable anymore, e.g., for ebuilds |
| 10 |
> or versions of packages that have not been in the tree for a looong time, |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Certainly. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> like, say, HAL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/401257. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
That isn't a HAL bug - it is a bug for a relatively recent version of pm-utils. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I'm not sure if the bug is still an issue, but it could very well be. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
And that is the issue with just closing bugs because they're old. |
| 21 |
They can still be issues. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
If an issue no longer exists then of course the bug should be closed. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Rich |
Archives