| 1 |
Hello! |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 09:07:33 -0500 |
| 4 |
Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> I'll venture a guess that it may have approached 9GB either with some |
| 7 |
> short-lived files, or *would* have approached 9GB with a different USE |
| 8 |
> flag or other configuration combination. |
| 9 |
> ... |
| 10 |
> Ok, then I'll narrow my guess to the size required being dependent on |
| 11 |
> USE flag combinations. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
Yes, I thought so too, but I use the same set of USE flags for quite |
| 14 |
a long time, and previous versions of LO really needed the stated |
| 15 |
amount of free space. At least, more than 6 GB. And the last version |
| 16 |
(3.4.4) not only needs about a half of the stated space, it needs |
| 17 |
*less* space than the previous versions. |
| 18 |
It may mean that the newer version is *substantially* reworked |
| 19 |
though, which is very good. :) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Regards, |
| 22 |
Vladimir |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
----- |
| 25 |
<v_2e@×××.net> |
Archives