Archives
Archives
| From: | James <wireless@×××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-user] Re: Why still postgres 8.2? | ||
| Date: | Tue, 19 May 2009 14:25:33 | ||
| Message-Id: | loom.20090519T142238-860@post.gmane.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Why still postgres 8.2? by Konstantinos Agouros |
||
| 1 | Konstantinos Agouros <elwood <at> agouros.de> writes: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > yes I know I could use ~ in package.keywords. But is there a good reason |
| 5 | > why postgres is still @8.0 and not at least 8.2? |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Dunno.... |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | However, now that Oracle owns mysql, maybe, just maybe, postgresql |
| 11 | will get a little bit more attention, across the net.... |
| 12 | and here at Gentoo.... |
| 13 | |
| 14 | My prediction is that Oracle is going to do every thing it can |
| 15 | to cause Mysql to lanquish...... |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | ymmv, |
| 19 | |
| 20 | James |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Why still postgres 8.2? | Aaron Clark <ophidian@×××××××××××××××.net> |