| 1 |
Success on compiling OOo! |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
I'm quite certain it was the ebuild, and that making it use the |
| 4 |
internal redland and not the system redland was the issue in my case. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
However, I've undone my changes in the ebuild and began compiling |
| 7 |
again so that I can confirm it fails with only that change. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I had also rebuilt redland, but as I told OOo not to use the system |
| 10 |
redland, that's why I'm checking again with the default ebuild. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Presuming my guess here is correct, then I need to make a bugzilla |
| 13 |
post on the matter. That's probably true anyway since I got the |
| 14 |
message: |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
* QA Notice: |
| 17 |
* Package openoffice is breaking /usr/share/config permissions. |
| 18 |
* Please report this issue to gentoo bugzilla. |
| 19 |
* Permissions will get adjusted automatically now. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
But that could be from my tinkering in the ebuild as well. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
My assumption on the cause of the problem is that I'm missing some |
| 24 |
dependency of redland that OOo expects, and it's not called in |
| 25 |
explicitly by portage. Either that or somehow I diffed my own install |
| 26 |
(would be news to me). |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
> FWIW, here's what I have (my OOo build works fine): |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> dev-libs/redland-1.0.9-r1 |
| 31 |
> dev-java/lucene - 2.3.2 |
| 32 |
> app-office/openoffice-3.1.1 (bash-completion cups dbus gstreamer gtk java |
| 33 |
> kde ldap -mono -odk) |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
These are the same as mine, with the exceptions that my lucene is |
| 37 |
slotted and my OOo has less USE flags. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
Regards, |
| 40 |
daid |
Archives