Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Michael Kintzios <michaelkintzios@××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: RE: [gentoo-user] building without X
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 10:07:21
Message-Id: 2348FF22DDBAD411BCD70002A51304480579F58E@BCV0X134EXC0001
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] building without X by "Eric S. Johansson"
1 To solve this I had to rebuild more than glibc:
2
3 # emerge linux26-headers gcc glibc xorg-x11
4
5 It then compiled xorg without any more problems.
6
7 Regards,
8
9 Mick
10
11 -----Original Message-----
12 From: Eric S. Johansson [mailto:esj@××××××.org]
13 Sent: 08 December 2004 02:05
14 To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
15 Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] building without X
16
17
18 Uwe Thiem wrote:
19
20 > Lemme guess. You are building a server for thing clients otherwise the
21
22 > statement above wouldn't make much sense. Alright, I will assume that.
23
24 effectively right but there are other models where this would fit.
25 think colinux systems.
26 >
27 > The X applications still need all the X-related libs to link against.
28 So you
29 > better build the whole X.
30 >
31 >>If it is impossible to split X11 into client and server packages, then
32 I
33 >>would need some help figuring out why it is dying on two security
34 >>related functions.
35 >
36 >
37 > So, what are those issues?
38
39 ./../programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/loader/libloader.a(xf86sym.o)(.data+0x
40 124c):
41 undefined reference to `__stack_smash_handler'
42 ./../programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/loader/libloader.a(xf86sym.o)(.data+0x
43 1254):
44 undefined reference to `__guard'
45 collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
46
47
48 someone else claimed that emerge sync and rebuilding glibc fixed the
49 problem. trying that now.
50
51 --- eric
52
53
54 --
55 "Part of the problem with the Wal-Mart business model is that it
56 requires more poverty in order to grow."
57
58 http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/2004/11/22/wal_mart/print.html
59
60 --
61 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
62
63
64
65
66 --
67 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list