1 |
On 25/07/12 23:05, Philip Webb wrote: |
2 |
> Isn't 22 nm going to be faster than 32 nm ? |
3 |
>[...] |
4 |
> How do you compare cores vs nm ? |
5 |
> How far is cache size important ( 6 vs 8 MB )? |
6 |
|
7 |
You simply ignore all that stuff and look at how fast the CPUs are. |
8 |
Some 45nm CPUs are faster than some 32nm and 22nm ones. How small the |
9 |
manufacturing process is does not say much about performance. At least |
10 |
not directly. |
11 |
|
12 |
IMO, the best recommendations come from Tom's Hardware. They update |
13 |
their recommendation every month or two: |
14 |
|
15 |
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/gaming-cpu-review-overclock,3106.html |
16 |
|
17 |
Ignore the "Gaming" in the title. It's really a recommendation of |
18 |
performance vs price. The only effect their focus on gaming has is that |
19 |
they ignore the integrated graphics of Intel CPUs. |