Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: new machine : CPU : 22 nm vs 32 nm
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 00:35:32
Message-Id: juq39g$212$1@dough.gmane.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] new machine : CPU : 22 nm vs 32 nm by Philip Webb
1 On 25/07/12 23:05, Philip Webb wrote:
2 > Isn't 22 nm going to be faster than 32 nm ?
3 >[...]
4 > How do you compare cores vs nm ?
5 > How far is cache size important ( 6 vs 8 MB )?
6
7 You simply ignore all that stuff and look at how fast the CPUs are.
8 Some 45nm CPUs are faster than some 32nm and 22nm ones. How small the
9 manufacturing process is does not say much about performance. At least
10 not directly.
11
12 IMO, the best recommendations come from Tom's Hardware. They update
13 their recommendation every month or two:
14
15 http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/gaming-cpu-review-overclock,3106.html
16
17 Ignore the "Gaming" in the title. It's really a recommendation of
18 performance vs price. The only effect their focus on gaming has is that
19 they ignore the integrated graphics of Intel CPUs.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new machine : CPU : 22 nm vs 32 nm Alecks Gates <alecks.g@×××××.com>