| 1 |
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 07:33:05AM +1300, Penguin Lover Jamie squawked: |
| 2 |
> I did an emerge pam but am still getting this error: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
<snip? |
| 5 |
> configure: error: *** libpam missing |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> !!! Please attach the config.log to your bug report: |
| 8 |
> !!! /var/tmp/portage/openssh-4.2_p1/work/openssh-4.2p1/config.log |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> !!! ERROR: net-misc/openssh-4.2_p1 failed. |
| 11 |
> !!! Function econf, Line 495, Exitcode 0 |
| 12 |
> !!! econf failed |
| 13 |
> !!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status |
| 14 |
> message. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Can anyone help me get around this? Is it possibly worth compiling |
| 17 |
> openssh without pam support to avoid this error? |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Did you not have PAM installed before? (You mentioned that you issued |
| 21 |
an emerge pam, but was pam installed before that?) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
You can compile openssh without pam support by removing the pam |
| 24 |
useflag: edit /etc/portage/package.use so that there's one line for |
| 25 |
'net-misc/openssh -pam' |
| 26 |
and retry your emerge. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
I personally have -pam in USE from make.conf, it depends on whether |
| 29 |
you need the functionality. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
W |
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
"`You ARE Zaphod Beeblebrox?' |
| 34 |
`Yeah,' said Zaphod, `but don't shout it out or they'll all |
| 35 |
want one.' |
| 36 |
`THE Zaphod Beeblebrox?' |
| 37 |
`No, just A Zaphod Bebblebrox, didn't you hear I come in |
| 38 |
six packs?' |
| 39 |
`But sir,' it squealed, `I just heard on the sub-ether |
| 40 |
radio report. It said you were dead...' |
| 41 |
`Yeah, that's right, I just haven't stopped moving yet.'" |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
- Zaphod and the Guide's receptionist. |
| 44 |
Sortir en Pantoufles: up 54 days, 11:22 |
| 45 |
-- |
| 46 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives