1 |
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 01:06:54AM -0400, Dave Nebinger wrote |
2 |
|
3 |
> I don't necessarily agree with using "-*" in your USE flags, simply |
4 |
> because I think the USE flags in the /etc/make.conf are meant to |
5 |
> enhance the builds with options you plan on using. Default USE |
6 |
> flags, as identified by the developers, typically are limited to |
7 |
> those components that the package needs to function correctly. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> And for those things that you really don't want to have, you can |
10 |
> always specify the negative USE flag, i.e. "-gnome" to totally |
11 |
> disable gnome (which is what I use). |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Using "-*" basically says that you know better than the developers, |
14 |
> which is a position I wouldn't want to take... |
15 |
|
16 |
One size does not fit all. Default flags have been a pet peeve of |
17 |
mine since the "ipv6" fiasco. |
18 |
|
19 |
> Otherwise the content was fine, but it makes me wonder why it would be |
20 |
> necessary. New folks migrating to Gentoo are going to use the handbook, |
21 |
> and I don't believe the handbook tells them to enable |
22 |
> framebuffer/bootsplash, etc. |
23 |
|
24 |
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?full=1#book_part1_chap10 |
25 |
|
26 |
suggests that it's OK, specifically the sentences... |
27 |
|
28 |
> But before we install one of these two bootloaders, we inform you |
29 |
> how to configure framebuffer (assuming you want it of course). With |
30 |
> framebuffer you can run the Linux command line with (limited) |
31 |
> graphical features (such as using the nice bootsplash image Gentoo |
32 |
> provides). |
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> |
36 |
My musings on technology and security at http://tech_sec.blog.ca |
37 |
-- |
38 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |