1 |
On 2019-06-24, Bryant Morrow wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> --- |
4 |
> |
5 |
> fdm-1.9 consistently fails to build, with configure citing a lack of |
6 |
> libssl as the reason. I have openssl installed, and |
7 |
> /usr/lib64/libssl.so (symlink to /usr/lib64/libssl.so.1.1) exists. |
8 |
> I've looked for similar problems online, with no luck. It originally |
9 |
> seemed to be related to a broken version of openssl being unmasked |
10 |
> along with the use of ~amd64 in ACCEPT_KEYWORDS, but resolving that |
11 |
> made no difference. It seems to me that fdm's config scripts simply |
12 |
> can't find libssl, but they appear to be looking in all of the correct |
13 |
> places. I had it installed and working in the past, but it was removed |
14 |
> due to a stupid (on my part) accident with emerge --depclean and now |
15 |
> fails to reinstall. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Output of emerge -pqv 'net-mail/fdm-1.9::gentoo': |
18 |
> http://dpaste.com/2B1YBPZ //emerge -pqv |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Output of emerge --info 'net-mail/fdm-1.9::gentoo': |
21 |
> http://dpaste.com/0D1PK0E //emerge --info |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Contents of build.log: http://dpaste.com/1CFZF87 //build.log |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Contents of portage environment file: http://dpaste.com/2XJD461 |
26 |
> //environment |
27 |
|
28 |
This looks like bug 677484 - the problem would indeed be the way this |
29 |
config script tries to detect libssl. |
30 |
|
31 |
I don't use fdm, but from what I read in the bug report, I suppose you |
32 |
could try downgrading openssl to 1.0.*, or change the fdm ebuild to |
33 |
apply the patch from comment 9. |
34 |
|
35 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=677484 |
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
Nuno Silva |