1 |
On 1/11/06, Michael Sullivan <michael@××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> <snip |
3 |
> > Have you tried a revdep-rebuild -p -v to see if there is a dependency |
4 |
> > issue that would be causing the evolution crash? Also, have you tried |
5 |
> > a re-emerge of evolution and evolution-data-server? Another option |
6 |
> > would be to emerge the ~x86 evolution (2.4.2.1) - it has been quite a |
7 |
> > bit more stable for me than previous versions of evolution. |
8 |
> </snip> |
9 |
> |
10 |
> I'm trying to emerge that version of evolution, but it won't let me. |
11 |
> Observe: |
12 |
> |
13 |
> camille evolution # cat /etc/portage/package.keywords | grep 'evolution' |
14 |
> mail-client/evolution-2.4.2.1 ~x86 |
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
This should be: |
18 |
|
19 |
=mail-client/evolution-2.4.2.1 ~x86 |
20 |
|
21 |
And the same for any of the dependencies that are currently marked ~x86 |
22 |
|
23 |
-James |
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
> camille evolution # emerge -p =evolution-2.4.2.1 |
27 |
> --- Invalid atom in /etc/portage/package.keywords: |
28 |
> mail-client/evolution-2.4.2.1 |
29 |
> --- Invalid atom in /etc/portage/package.unmask: |
30 |
> mail-client/evolution-2.4.2.1 |
31 |
> |
32 |
> These are the packages that I would merge, in order: |
33 |
> |
34 |
> Calculating dependencies |
35 |
> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "=evolution-2.4.2.1" have been |
36 |
> masked. |
37 |
> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your |
38 |
> request: |
39 |
> - mail-client/evolution-2.4.2.1 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) |
40 |
> |
41 |
> For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page |
42 |
> or |
43 |
> refer to the Gentoo Handbook. |
44 |
> |
45 |
> What's the deal here? |
46 |
> |
47 |
> -- |
48 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
49 |
> |
50 |
> |
51 |
|
52 |
-- |
53 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |