1 |
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> [ huge snip ] |
5 |
> |
6 |
>> Each time, you've acted as though the new stance is what you've been |
7 |
>> arguing from all along, but because you haven't communicated that, |
8 |
>> it's impossible to reasonably discuss specifics in practicality. I |
9 |
>> think I'm done with this particular discussion. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> I think I'm done too. I just stated my opinion; do whatever you want |
12 |
> with it. Including ignoring it, of course. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Regards. |
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
I already decided to do that. Someone makes a argument and you change |
18 |
the situation to fit your point then change again when someone points |
19 |
out that is not right either. This just continues on for infinity. |
20 |
|
21 |
I also don't folks like putting down the work Walt is doing. People |
22 |
are not liking where udev is going and are trying to do something |
23 |
different and all you do is belittle them for even trying. |
24 |
|
25 |
Back to my hole. |
26 |
|
27 |
Dale |
28 |
|
29 |
:-) :-) |
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or |
34 |
how you interpreted my words! |
35 |
|
36 |
Miss the compile output? Hint: |
37 |
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n" |