1 |
On 01/22/10 10:43, Stroller wrote: |
2 |
>> |
3 |
>>I don't understand what kind of explanation you expect, just emerge |
4 |
>>squid iptable (make sure kernel has the correct entries compiled |
5 |
>>IN) and type those commends in at the command line; read the post |
6 |
>>above some other users clearly suggested what to type at the |
7 |
>>command line :-) |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>>It just works! I stated my objectives and I accomplished them. |
10 |
> |
11 |
>Maybe I'm being very dumb. I assumed a situation of router A, with |
12 |
>Squid running on server B. The office staff are using browsers on |
13 |
>client machines X, Y & Z. When a user on machine X browses to a |
14 |
>website, his PC sends the packet to router A. The packet never |
15 |
>reaches server B in order to be intercepted by B. We can configure B |
16 |
>as the proxy in the browser settings of X, Y & Z, but then that no |
17 |
>longer needs iptables configuration or interception mode. |
18 |
> |
19 |
>I'm not trying to argue with you, BTW. I'm just trying to learn from |
20 |
>you. |
21 |
> |
22 |
>Stroller. |
23 |
|
24 |
I'm not an expert with iptables but since you have multiple machine on your network your best option is to configure single machine to run squid on it and |
25 |
forward the traffic to it. |
26 |
You have to tell us your setup, what kind of equipment you have, it it a small firewall/router from store you build it etc. |
27 |
How the traffic flow, I might suggest something. |
28 |
|
29 |
I think in your situation best option would be if router A runs squid if possible; if not router A intercept all packets from X,Y,X and sends them to squid B |
30 |
machine, B process the traffic and send it back to router A (rotter A forward all traffic from squid B to Internet). |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
Joseph |