| 1 |
On Wednesday 18 Sep 2013 17:09:37 Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 18/09/2013 16:05, Peter Humphrey wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Wednesday 18 Sep 2013 14:52:30 Ralf Ramsauer wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> In my opinion, reiser is a bit outdated ... |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > What is the significance of its date? I use reiserfs on my Atom box for |
| 7 |
> > /var, /var/cache/squid and /usr/portage, and on my workstation for |
| 8 |
> > /usr/portage and /home/prh/.VirtualBox. It's never given me any trouble |
| 9 |
> > at all. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
--->8 |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> Circumstances have caused ReiserFS to become a high-risk scenario and |
| 14 |
> even though it might perform faultlessly right now, continued use should |
| 15 |
> be evaluated in terms of that very real risk. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Sensible advice - thanks. I'll bear it in mind as I continue working on these |
| 18 |
boxes. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Regards, |
| 22 |
Peter |
Archives