| 1 |
Bill Longman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 03/24/2011 11:17 AM, Dale wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> kashani wrote: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>>> On 3/24/2011 10:19 AM, Dale wrote: |
| 7 |
>>> |
| 8 |
>>>> I have never used LVM but when it messes up after a upgrade, as has |
| 9 |
>>>> happened to many others, see if you say the same thing. I hope your |
| 10 |
>>>> backups are good and they can restore. |
| 11 |
>>>> |
| 12 |
>>>> Dale |
| 13 |
>>>> |
| 14 |
>>> Meh, boot a liveCD and fix it which took all of 15 minutes. I |
| 15 |
>>> don't see that as a failing of LVM, but of Gentoo for lack of another |
| 16 |
>>> culprit. You can only roll your OS forward in so many ways before you |
| 17 |
>>> have to do a little offline plumbing. May as well complain that you |
| 18 |
>>> had to shutdown your machine to put in more RAM. |
| 19 |
>>> |
| 20 |
>>> kashani |
| 21 |
>>> |
| 22 |
>>> |
| 23 |
>>> |
| 24 |
>> I researched using LVM a good while back. The reason I didn't was what |
| 25 |
>> I posted. It is prone to problems that are difficult if not impossible |
| 26 |
>> to correct. I may not have data that is worth much but I don't want to |
| 27 |
>> loose it either way. |
| 28 |
>> |
| 29 |
>> People that have read these posts can't plead ignorance. |
| 30 |
>> |
| 31 |
> Yet you, who "have never used LVM" *can* plead knowledge? |
| 32 |
> Uh....something's really wrong in this formula. |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Yep, I read about others having problems and loosing data. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Dale |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
:-) :-) |
Archives