1 |
Neil Bothwick wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 09:26:52 -0300, Mauro Faccenda wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> > > You see? They cant be the same, because the closing "]" is needed |
5 |
>> > > by /usr/bin[ and not by /usr/bin/test |
6 |
>> > |
7 |
>> > It's quite common for a program to change its behaviour according to |
8 |
>> > the name used to run it. For example, zcat and gunzip are links to |
9 |
>> > gzip, yet the three programs behave differently. |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> but this isn't the case: |
12 |
> |
13 |
> I was disagreeing with the "cant be the same" comment. I know they are |
14 |
> different files, but the slightly different behaviour is insufficient |
15 |
> reason for that. Alexander asked why one was not a link to the other, I'd |
16 |
> like to know too, but this isn't the reason. |
17 |
|
18 |
Yes, you're right, [ and test *COULD* be the same command, just like |
19 |
gzip and gunzip are the same command, but the coreutils makers seem |
20 |
to have decided otherwise. It's not that important to me, if it were, |
21 |
I'd ask the coreutils makers and not some 3rd party. :) |
22 |
|
23 |
Anyway, on other systems (HP-UX, Solaris 8), there isn't even a |
24 |
/usr/bin/[ - there's just /usr/bin/test. |
25 |
|
26 |
Alexander Skwar |
27 |
-- |
28 |
May those that love us love us; and those that don't love us, may |
29 |
God turn their hearts; and if he doesn't turn their hearts, may |
30 |
he turn their ankles so we'll know them by their limping. |
31 |
-- |
32 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |