1 |
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 9:24 PM YUE Daian <sheepduke@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> Recently I posted a bug report to Gentoo Bugzilla and submitted a |
4 |
> request to add package Roswell into the package tree. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/638446 |
7 |
> |
8 |
> But...in fact it was not "recent" at all! I submitted the bug one year |
9 |
> ago and there is literally no news after some point. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Is there anything I can do more? |
12 |
|
13 |
You can always host it in an overlay, or try submitting it to |
14 |
proxy-maintainers. Volunteering to proxy-maintain the package would |
15 |
probably also help - that basically involves committing to keep it up |
16 |
to date and deal with bugs/etc. |
17 |
|
18 |
The obvious QA issue I could think of with putting this in the main |
19 |
repo is where it sticks its files and how well-behaved it is. When it |
20 |
installs lisp packages does it keep them in some kind of tidy area |
21 |
that isn't going to step on the rest of the filesystem? |
22 |
Language-specific package managers can sometimes be messy in that way. |
23 |
|
24 |
My guess though is that this reflects a lack of interest in lisp more |
25 |
than any specific criticism. If somebody had a criticism they'd have |
26 |
pointed it out. |
27 |
|
28 |
I didn't look at your package too closely but one little tweak you |
29 |
should make is something like: |
30 |
|
31 |
SRC_URI="https://github.com/roswell/roswell/archive/v${PV}.zip -> ${P}.zip" |
32 |
|
33 |
That makes it easier to maintain by renaming the package version |
34 |
number, and it also cleans up the filename in the distfiles cache (and |
35 |
on the mirrors). |
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
Rich |