Archives
Archives
| From: | David Relson <relson@×××××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Digest verification failed: | ||
| Date: | Sun, 01 Oct 2006 16:15:59 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20061001121141.4362b456@osage.osagesoftware.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Digest verification failed: by "Bo Ørsted Andresen" |
||
| 1 | On Sun, 1 Oct 2006 03:41:39 +0200 |
| 2 | Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | ...[snip]... |
| 5 | |
| 6 | > Since the offending file is in the portage tree rather than in |
| 7 | > distfiles it doesn't make a lot of sense to delete it since only a |
| 8 | > sync will be able to refetch it anyway. Had it been in distfiles then |
| 9 | > Dales suggestions are correct. |
| 10 | > |
| 11 | > In this case, however, the problem isn't with the file rather it's |
| 12 | > with dev-util/pycrypto (which calculates the hash) [2]. And wow, that |
| 13 | > bug is really old by now! ;P The solution: |
| 14 | > |
| 15 | > # emerge -va1 =dev-python/pycrypto-2.0.1-r5 |
| 16 | > |
| 17 | > [1] |
| 18 | > http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-amd64.xml?part=2&chap=1#doc_chap4 |
| 19 | > [2] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131293 |
| 20 | > |
| 21 | > -- |
| 22 | > Bo Andresen |
| 23 | |
| 24 | Bo, |
| 25 | |
| 26 | You've provided the solution! Thanks. |
| 27 | |
| 28 | David |
| 29 | |
| 30 | -- |
| 31 | gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |