| 1 |
On Freitag 22 Mai 2009, Alex Schuster wrote: |
| 2 |
> Volker Armin Hemmann writes: |
| 3 |
> > On Freitag 22 Mai 2009, Kevin O'Gorman wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.552-r2 won't compile due to a file conflict, |
| 5 |
> > > but portageq does not see it. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Probably because the ati-drivers you already have installed do not have |
| 8 |
> this file, either because they are an older version, or they did not create |
| 9 |
> it when compiling against the old x.org. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> > > Anybody know how to work around this? |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > yes, remove /usr/lib/opengl/ati/extensions/libglx.so it should be owned |
| 14 |
> > by ati-drivers, if not, some screw up happened. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Or use 'FEATURES=-collision-protect emerge ati-drivers'. I think I had the |
| 17 |
> same collision. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> > /me wonders why there is still a stone old buggy ebuild/driver in |
| 20 |
> > 'stable'. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> I was not able to compile newer ati-drivers with |
| 23 |
> tuxonice-sources-2.6.28-r3. Or ANY ati-drivers with a newer tuxonice |
| 24 |
> kernel. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Wonko |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
9.4 and 9.5 worked fine with 2.6.28.X+tuxonice patches (not using ebuild for |
| 29 |
tuxonice, using 'homemade' ebuilds for 9.4&5 because ebuild renaming seems to |
| 30 |
be hard atm). |
Archives