1 |
On Thursday 14 February 2008, Dale wrote: |
2 |
> Uwe Thiem wrote: |
3 |
> > On Thursday 14 February 2008, Dale wrote: |
4 |
> >> I did a little test. Something fishy here. I did a test with |
5 |
> >> the /data partition. I store pictures and documents there and |
6 |
> >> it was fragmented. I cp -av to another reiserfs formatted |
7 |
> >> partition then remade the file system and copied it back using |
8 |
> >> basically the same command just in reverse. This is what I got |
9 |
> >> now: |
10 |
> >> |
11 |
> >> root@smoker / # /root/fragck.pl /data/ |
12 |
> >> 3.88457269700333% non contiguous files, 1.04344379261138 average |
13 |
> >> fragments. root@smoker / # |
14 |
> >> |
15 |
> >> That is not a lot better than it was before. It was 4.6% |
16 |
> >> before. How is that? I copied it over then ran the command |
17 |
> >> right after without even touching the files. |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> > Before you copy back, you have to "clean" the old partition - |
20 |
> > either by deleting everything or by partioning it. |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> > Uwe |
23 |
> |
24 |
> I just did a mkreiserfs /dev/hdb1. That should work right? |
25 |
|
26 |
Actually, I meant "by formatting it" instead of "partioning". So yes, |
27 |
that should work. |
28 |
|
29 |
Maybe fragch.pl is simply buggy. |
30 |
|
31 |
Uwe |
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
Informal Linux Group Namibia: |
35 |
http://www.linux.org.na/ |
36 |
SysEx (Pty) Ltd.: |
37 |
http://www.SysEx.com.na/ |
38 |
-- |
39 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |