| 1 |
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:09:14 +0200 |
| 2 |
"Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike)" <klondike@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> > I wish people wouldn't just remove stuff without full details. If |
| 5 |
> > there's an issue with that code, there should be a bug at b.g.o. and |
| 6 |
> > the Changelog should mention it. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > Then folks like yourself can read it and make informed decisions. |
| 9 |
> > As it stands, you have nothing but mystery. Argggg. |
| 10 |
> Well deprecated version removal tends to happen because we are not |
| 11 |
> going to aim for those versions stabilization AND there is a newer |
| 12 |
> version available AND upstream tends to ignore bugs happening on |
| 13 |
> older versions. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> What this means for you is that we are not going to force you to |
| 16 |
> upgrade but if something fails you are in your own ;) |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> PS: Next time come by #gentoo-hardened we won't bite you, I promise ;) |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
My comment wasn't really directed at -hardened specifically. I've just |
| 21 |
had a belly-full lately of $STUFF being changed at $RANDOM times by arb |
| 22 |
$PEOPLE, and not specifically Gentoo either. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
SO I sounded off a bit and let off some steam. Sorry if it came across |
| 25 |
as directed at your team, that wasn't the intent. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Alan McKinnnon |
| 29 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
Archives