1 |
On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 13:37 -0800, Grant wrote: |
2 |
> > > I need to have VMware installed on my web server to test updates. |
3 |
> > > I've been searching for a way to do this without installing X for a |
4 |
> > > while, and it just doesn't seem do-able. |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > Why run VMWare on the server? Run a clone of the server in a VMWare |
7 |
> > machine on a desktop computer. Test updates on there and then update the |
8 |
> > server the same when you know everything is OK. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> |
11 |
> That does sound pretty good, especially since VMware just virtualizes |
12 |
> all of your hardware anyway. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> There seem to be a few different options here. Here's a summary: |
15 |
> |
16 |
> *User-Mode-Linux |
17 |
> You have to use the usermode-sources for your guest OS or patch your |
18 |
> (vanilla) kernel. If that's not what you're running on your host OS, |
19 |
> your tests are less complete. The devs are also set up differently on |
20 |
> the guest OS. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> *VMware Workstation |
23 |
> You have to have X installed on the system. You can use xvfb instead |
24 |
> ( http://www.vttoth.com/vmvfb.htm ) |
25 |
> ( http://www.lemoncube.com/104.html ) |
26 |
> but that seems to end up a lot like having full-blown X. xvfb is also |
27 |
> not in Portage and seems difficult to put together. The other option |
28 |
> (mentioned in this thread) is setting up the test OS on a workstation |
29 |
> instead of the server. This would change things a bit more from the |
30 |
> way they are on the live system so your tests are a bit less complete. |
31 |
> |
32 |
> *chroot |
33 |
> You can't test changes to the kernel. |
34 |
> |
35 |
> *separate box |
36 |
> Expensive. |
37 |
> |
38 |
> - Grant |
39 |
|
40 |
I've not looked into it too much, but is there anything wrong with qemu? |
41 |
|
42 |
-- |
43 |
Tom Wesley <tom@×××××.org> |