| 1 |
Nikos Chantziaras <realnc <at> gmail.com> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> On 21/04/15 21:14, james wrote: |
| 5 |
> > How do you tell if a ~9999 is actually based on the nightlies, |
| 6 |
> > 5.1 or is just old ebuild with the .9999 extension somebody never |
| 7 |
> > got around to renaming or deleting? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> 9999 are live ebuilds. Not based on any release or nightlies. They |
| 10 |
> download the code from a version control repository (Git, Svn, etc.) in |
| 11 |
> whatever state it currently is and build from that. The version before |
| 12 |
> the 9999 usually specifies the branch. For example, 5.0.9999 would mean |
| 13 |
> the latest state of the 5.0 branch (or whatever branch name would apply |
| 14 |
> to that version, like "stable".) |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Agreeded. Look at this gcc.9999.ebuild and you tell me what version |
| 19 |
it is (Overlay: chromiumos (layman): |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
http://gpo.zugaina.org/sys-devel/gcc |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Sure there is a live ebuild for the latest gcc (5.1.x) ? |
| 25 |
I just cannot find it ..... |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
tia, |
| 29 |
James |
Archives