| 1 |
On Saturday 25 February 2006 00:36, Benno Schulenberg wrote: |
| 2 |
> But it's working now. So tell us how many frames glxgears is doing |
| 3 |
> now, with and without radeon. :) |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Actually the results using dri is worse than the results without dri in terms |
| 6 |
of frame rates. Without dri I get something like 250 FPS. With dri I get |
| 7 |
something like 228 FPS. The great difference though is when looking at the X |
| 8 |
cpu usage. glxgears uses around 0.5 % with or without dri. But without dri X |
| 9 |
uses 92% of the cpu resources. With dri X uses between 0.5 and 1% cpu. So |
| 10 |
obviously dri is preferable... ;) |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Listed the output below if anyone is interested. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
~$ glxinfo | grep dir |
| 15 |
direct rendering: No |
| 16 |
OpenGL renderer string: Mesa GLX Indirect |
| 17 |
~$ glxgears |
| 18 |
792 frames in 5.0 seconds = 158.400 FPS |
| 19 |
1945 frames in 5.0 seconds = 389.000 FPS |
| 20 |
1847 frames in 5.0 seconds = 369.400 FPS |
| 21 |
1265 frames in 5.0 seconds = 253.000 FPS |
| 22 |
1138 frames in 5.0 seconds = 227.600 FPS |
| 23 |
1139 frames in 5.0 seconds = 227.800 FPS |
| 24 |
1265 frames in 5.0 seconds = 253.000 FPS |
| 25 |
1138 frames in 5.0 seconds = 227.600 FPS |
| 26 |
1139 frames in 5.0 seconds = 227.800 FPS |
| 27 |
1265 frames in 5.0 seconds = 253.000 FPS |
| 28 |
1265 frames in 5.0 seconds = 253.000 FPS |
| 29 |
1265 frames in 5.0 seconds = 253.000 FPS |
| 30 |
1265 frames in 5.0 seconds = 253.000 FPS |
| 31 |
1265 frames in 5.0 seconds = 253.000 FPS |
| 32 |
1265 frames in 5.0 seconds = 253.000 FPS |
| 33 |
1138 frames in 5.0 seconds = 227.600 FPS |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
X usage ~92% |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
~$ glxinfo | grep dir |
| 38 |
direct rendering: Yes |
| 39 |
~$ glxgears |
| 40 |
1035 frames in 5.0 seconds = 207.000 FPS |
| 41 |
1162 frames in 5.0 seconds = 232.400 FPS |
| 42 |
1155 frames in 5.0 seconds = 231.000 FPS |
| 43 |
1143 frames in 5.0 seconds = 228.600 FPS |
| 44 |
844 frames in 5.0 seconds = 168.800 FPS |
| 45 |
1145 frames in 5.0 seconds = 229.000 FPS |
| 46 |
1135 frames in 5.0 seconds = 227.000 FPS |
| 47 |
1164 frames in 5.0 seconds = 232.800 FPS |
| 48 |
1144 frames in 5.0 seconds = 228.800 FPS |
| 49 |
627 frames in 5.0 seconds = 125.400 FPS |
| 50 |
1048 frames in 5.0 seconds = 209.600 FPS |
| 51 |
1148 frames in 5.0 seconds = 229.600 FPS |
| 52 |
1141 frames in 5.0 seconds = 228.200 FPS |
| 53 |
1057 frames in 5.0 seconds = 211.400 FPS |
| 54 |
1077 frames in 5.0 seconds = 215.400 FPS |
| 55 |
1137 frames in 5.0 seconds = 227.400 FPS |
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
X usage: 0.5-1% |
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
-- |
| 60 |
Bo Andresen |
| 61 |
-- |
| 62 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives