| 1 |
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 3:40 PM William Kenworthy <billk@×××××××××.au> |
| 2 |
wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Rsync is not a good tool for measuring throughput as its optimisations |
| 7 |
> are problematic - and this can show up when comparing local to remote |
| 8 |
> tests. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Yup. A better option is to use something like net-misc/iperf. That will |
| 12 |
give you a much better idea of the raw network performance. It's also |
| 13 |
available on Windows so you can use it to test Linux<->Windows and |
| 14 |
Windows<->Windows speeds as well as Linux<->Linux speeds. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Manuel A. McLure WW1FA <manuel@××××××.org> <http://www.mclure.org> |
| 18 |
...for in Ulthar, according to an ancient and significant law, |
| 19 |
no man may kill a cat. -- H.P. Lovecraft |
Archives