Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Fernando Rodriguez <frodriguez.developer@×××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Will a 64-bit-no-multilib machine cross-compile 32-bit code?
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 19:52:37
Message-Id: 2482967.XKl8GgfQej@navi
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Will a 64-bit-no-multilib machine cross-compile 32-bit code? by Mike Gilbert
1 On Saturday, March 21, 2015 8:46:10 AM Mike Gilbert wrote:
2 > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:20 AM, Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> wrote:
3 > > CFLAGS="-O2 -march=atom -mno-cx16 -msahf -mmovbe -mno-aes -mno-pclmul -
4 mno-popcnt -mno-abm -mno-lwp -mno-fma -mno-fma4 -mno-xop -mno-bmi -mno-bmi2 -
5 mno-tbm -mno-avx -mno-avx2 -mno-sse4.2 -mno-sse4.1 -mno-lzcnt -mno-rtm -mno-
6 hle -mno-rdrnd -mno-f16c -mno-fsgsbase -mno-rdseed -mno-prfchw -mno-adx -mfxsr
7 -mno-xsave -mno-xsaveopt --param l1-cache-size=24 --param l1-cache-line-
8 size=64 --param l2-cache-size=512 -mtune=atom -fstack-protector -mfpmath=sse -
9 fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -fno-unwind-tables -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables"
10 > >
11 > > Is that correct (assuming that's my output)?
12 > >
13 >
14 > I should warn you against including all of those -mno-xxx flags. This
15 > has been known to break the build process for packages like chromium,
16 > which always wants to build with SSE4 support and toggles it off at
17 > runtime. Passing -mno-sse4.1 causes a build failure as it tries to use
18 > macros that are not defined.
19 >
20
21 Isn't it possible that removing it for all packages would cause a more subtle
22 problem with another faulty ebuild (like a program crashing due to an illegal
23 instruction)?
24
25 --
26 Fernando Rodriguez

Replies