1 |
On 07/12/2015 03:40 PM, James wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> Makes sense; but I cannot find the file. I get lots of hits for a |
4 |
> "configure.in" in my code trees, but little on the rest of the system; here |
5 |
> are the few: |
6 |
|
7 |
It doesn't get installed. Just like how ./configure creates your |
8 |
Makefile, there's something that the upstream author runs to create the |
9 |
"configure" script. That thing used to be called configure.in, but now |
10 |
configure.ac is preferred. |
11 |
|
12 |
You can file a bug upstream. They might not know the old name is |
13 |
deprecated. Here's the reference: |
14 |
|
15 |
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2013-06/msg00009.html |
16 |
|
17 |
I quote: |
18 |
|
19 |
- Automake 2.0 will drop support for the long-deprecated |
20 |
'configure.in' name for the Autoconf input file. You are advised to |
21 |
start using the recommended name 'configure.ac' instead, ASAP. |