1 |
> I had a deeper look into the kernel sources: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> Your error message is exactly thrown by |
4 |
> static bool k8_mc1_mce(u16 ec, u8 xec) |
5 |
> |
6 |
> So probably you have a K8 ;-) |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Have a look at: |
9 |
> http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv5-list/2007-October/msg00075.html |
10 |
|
11 |
I read it, that one sounds like a correctable ECC RAM error. |
12 |
|
13 |
> It *might* be an error concerning ECC error correction. Did you recently |
14 |
> change any hardware? |
15 |
|
16 |
No hardware changed in a very long time. |
17 |
|
18 |
> Could you attach your /proc/cpuinfo? |
19 |
|
20 |
Sure, I've attached it. I'm changing hosts and machines shortly and |
21 |
I've only seen this error once so I'm thinking I don't need to take |
22 |
action. |
23 |
|
24 |
- Grant |
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
>> I share this opinion. |
28 |
>> The message says - even if the error was corrected - that there's |
29 |
>> something dramatically wrong with your - i suppose - CPU. |
30 |
>> "Corrected error" might imply, that some low-level feature got disabled |
31 |
>> in order to prevent furher errors. |
32 |
>> |
33 |
>> Does this error appear only once at early boot or frequently? |
34 |
>> |
35 |
>> Regards, |
36 |
>> -- |
37 |
>> Ralf |
38 |
>> |
39 |
>> On 09/23/13 22:07, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
40 |
>>> Am 23.09.2013 20:59, schrieb Paul Hartman: |
41 |
>>>> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Grant <emailgrant@×××××.com> wrote: |
42 |
>>>>> Can anyone tell me how to decipher this which has appeared in dmesg? |
43 |
>>>>> Google wasn't very helpful. |
44 |
>>>>> |
45 |
>>>>> [Hardware Error]: MC1 Error: Copyback Parity/Victim error. |
46 |
>>>>> [Hardware Error]: Error Status: Corrected error, no action required. |
47 |
>>>>> [Hardware Error]: CPU:3 (10:2:3) MC1_STATUS[-|CE|-|-|-]: 0x9000000000000171 |
48 |
>>>>> [Hardware Error]: cache level: L1, tx: INSN, mem-tx: EV |
49 |
>>>> Looks like machine check error, it detected an error in the L1 cache |
50 |
>>>> on your CPU. |
51 |
>>>> |
52 |
>>>> Since it says "Corrected error, no action required" I would not worry |
53 |
>>>> about it. If that makes you feel any better. :) |
54 |
>>>> |
55 |
>>>> |
56 |
>>> since those errors are rare, I would worry about it. |