1 |
On Saturday 30 Jul 2016 06:38:01 Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 6:24 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |
3 |
wrote: |
4 |
> > On 29/07/2016 22:58, Mick wrote: |
5 |
> >> Interesting article explaining why Uber are moving away from PostgreSQL. |
6 |
> >> I am |
7 |
> >> running both DBs on different desktop PCs for akonadi and I'm also |
8 |
> >> running |
9 |
> >> MySQL on a number of websites. Let's which one goes sideways first. :p |
10 |
> >> |
11 |
> >> https://eng.uber.com/mysql-migration/ |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > I don't think your akonadi and some web sites compares in any way to Uber |
14 |
> > and what they do. |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > FWIW, my Dev colleagues support and entire large corporate ISP's |
17 |
> > operational and customer data on PostgreSQL-9.3. With clustering. With no |
18 |
> > db-related issues :-) |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Agree, you'd need to be fairly large-scale to have their issues, but I |
21 |
> think the article was something anybody interested in databases should |
22 |
> read. If nothing else it is a really easy to follow explanation of |
23 |
> the underlying architectures. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> I'll probably post this to my LUG mailing list. I think one of the |
26 |
> Postgres devs lurks there so I'm curious to his impressions. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> I was a bit surprised to hear about the data corruption bug. I've |
29 |
> always considered Postgres to have a better reputation for data |
30 |
> integrity. |
31 |
|
32 |
Yes, same here, I would be interested to hear what the Postgres dev says, |
33 |
should he respond to it. |
34 |
|
35 |
-- |
36 |
Regards, |
37 |
Mick |