| 1 |
On Saturday 30 Jul 2016 06:38:01 Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 6:24 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |
| 3 |
wrote: |
| 4 |
> > On 29/07/2016 22:58, Mick wrote: |
| 5 |
> >> Interesting article explaining why Uber are moving away from PostgreSQL. |
| 6 |
> >> I am |
| 7 |
> >> running both DBs on different desktop PCs for akonadi and I'm also |
| 8 |
> >> running |
| 9 |
> >> MySQL on a number of websites. Let's which one goes sideways first. :p |
| 10 |
> >> |
| 11 |
> >> https://eng.uber.com/mysql-migration/ |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > I don't think your akonadi and some web sites compares in any way to Uber |
| 14 |
> > and what they do. |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > FWIW, my Dev colleagues support and entire large corporate ISP's |
| 17 |
> > operational and customer data on PostgreSQL-9.3. With clustering. With no |
| 18 |
> > db-related issues :-) |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Agree, you'd need to be fairly large-scale to have their issues, but I |
| 21 |
> think the article was something anybody interested in databases should |
| 22 |
> read. If nothing else it is a really easy to follow explanation of |
| 23 |
> the underlying architectures. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> I'll probably post this to my LUG mailing list. I think one of the |
| 26 |
> Postgres devs lurks there so I'm curious to his impressions. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> I was a bit surprised to hear about the data corruption bug. I've |
| 29 |
> always considered Postgres to have a better reputation for data |
| 30 |
> integrity. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Yes, same here, I would be interested to hear what the Postgres dev says, |
| 33 |
should he respond to it. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
Regards, |
| 37 |
Mick |
Archives