Archives
Archives
| From: | BRM <bm_witness@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout --> openrc ? | ||
| Date: | Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:19:07 | ||
| Message-Id: | 315555.23435.qm@web51902.mail.re2.yahoo.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout --> openrc ? by Neil Bothwick |
||
| 1 | ----- Original Message ---- |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > From: Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> |
| 4 | > On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 00:29:30 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 5 | > > > Although, perhaps I'm missing something but doesn't alpha |
| 6 | > > > come *before* release candidate? :) |
| 7 | > > Yes, but: |
| 8 | > > |
| 9 | > > 2.2.0_alpha1 comes *after* 2.2_rc99 |
| 10 | > |
| 11 | > It should also come after 2.2, but I appear to have missed that release. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Why? 2.2 == 2.2.0 |
| 14 | |
| 15 | So 2.2.0_alpha1 would make a logical progression. |
| 16 | |
| 17 | Ben |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout --> openrc ? | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> |