Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Andrew Penhorwood <andrew@××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge failed for sys-devel/binutils-2.23.2
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 00:41:16
Message-Id: 52D1E4A6.9020100@coldbits.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge failed for sys-devel/binutils-2.23.2 by walt
1 I will try the -j1. This is a VM that is initially setup my Linode.com.
2
3 Andrew
4
5 On 1/11/2014 6:19 PM, walt wrote:
6 > On 01/11/2014 02:32 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
7 >> On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 17:16:36 -0500
8 >> Andrew Penhorwood <andrew@××××××××.com> wrote:
9 >>
10 >>> * ERROR: sys-devel/binutils-2.23.2::gentoo failed (compile phase):
11 >>> * emake failed
12 >>> *
13 >>> * Call stack:
14 >>> * ebuild.sh, line 93: Called src_compile
15 >>> * environment, line 2823: Called toolchain-binutils_src_compile
16 >>> * environment, line 3514: Called die
17 >>> * The specific snippet of code:
18 >>> * emake all || die "emake failed";
19 >>> *
20 >>> * If you need support, post the output of `emerge --info
21 >>> '=sys-devel/binutils-2.23.2::gentoo'`,
22 >>> * the complete build log and the output of `emerge -pqv
23 >>> '=sys-devel/binutils-2.23.2::gentoo'`.
24 >>> * The complete build log is located at
25 >>> '/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.23.2/temp/build.log'.
26 >>> * The ebuild environment file is located at
27 >>> '/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.23.2/temp/environment'.
28 >>> * Working directory:
29 >>> '/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.23.2/work/build'
30 >>> * S:
31 >>> '/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.23.2/work/binutils-2.23.2'
32 >> Can you please file a bug about this at https://bugs.gentoo.org and
33 >> attach all the requested information? At the very least comment with
34 >> the output of `emerge --info` and attach the complete build.log.
35 > I was about to reply to Andrew that running an emerge with -j1 can make
36 > the build log easier to scan for errors, and can sometimes even prevent
37 > build errors in certain packages.
38 >
39 > [OT]
40 > Tom, I very rudely forgot to thank you for your reply to my recent post
41 > about layman. So...thank you!
42 >
43 > As a group we tend to be tough on devs who actually answer questions here
44 > even though we really are harmless. No, really, we are, honest, just ask
45 > us.
46 >
47 >
48 >
49 >
50 >
51 >
52
53
54 --
55 Andrew Penhorwood
56 ColdBits, LLC
57 www.coldbits.com
58 andrew@××××××××.com
59 740-358-9129

Replies