1 |
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 02:13:49PM +0200, YoYo Siska wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 12:50:40PM +0200, meino.cramer@×××.de wrote: |
3 |
> > The output of |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > gcc-config -l |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > is |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > [1] armv7a-unknown-linux-gnueabi-4.7.2 |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > [2] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.4.7 |
12 |
> > [3] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.5.4 * |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> |
15 |
> seems that the armv7a compiler isn't 'active' in the gcc-config output |
16 |
> (no asterix after the [1] option), did you try to 'reactivate' it with |
17 |
> gcc-config, ie |
18 |
> # gcc-config 1 |
19 |
> ? |
20 |
> |
21 |
> My output here: |
22 |
> julka ~ # gcc-config -l |
23 |
> [1] armv4tl-softfloat-linux-gnueabi-4.4.6 * |
24 |
> [2] armv4tl-softfloat-linux-gnueabi-4.5.3 |
25 |
> |
26 |
> [3] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.4.4 |
27 |
> [4] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.5.3 * |
28 |
> |
29 |
> (Though it is possible the asterix won't show up if there is only one |
30 |
> option, but reactivating it should do anything bad...) |
31 |
... shouldn't do anything bad... ;) |
32 |
|
33 |
yoyo |