| 1 |
On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 12:22:39 +0300 |
| 2 |
lego12239@××××××.ru wrote: |
| 3 |
> The core of portage should be in C, imho. But it can be extendable |
| 4 |
> with hooks written in something simple like a bash. |
| 5 |
> It mustn't be a solid binary. It can be splitted into separate parts |
| 6 |
> with strict definitions of interaction and interface. |
| 7 |
There is no rational reason for the core of Portage to be written in |
| 8 |
C. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> :-D This shouldn't be a problem, because developers of extension |
| 11 |
> modules/hooks(if they choose C for this) will use a something |
| 12 |
> like libportage with util and wrapper functions which will hide |
| 13 |
> all mallocs. |
| 14 |
And you yourself gave a very good reason why. |
Archives