| 1 |
On Wednesday 21 February 2007, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 09:51:45 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 3 |
> > That would be true except I've beeen setting loop to <M> since many |
| 4 |
> > kernel versions back. I actually suspect it's more a udev thing, |
| 5 |
> > there has been a lot of activity and changes with the rules |
| 6 |
> > recently. But I'm too rushed to decrypt all the rules syntax and |
| 7 |
> > see what changed. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> My loop devices disappeared like this some time ago - are you using |
| 10 |
> stable? I initially put loop in modules.autoload.d but since I use |
| 11 |
> loop devices every time I boot, I moved them into the kernel instead. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
No, I'm using ~x86. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I got things to a satisfactory state using modules.autoload.d just like |
| 16 |
you and get the best of both worlds. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
thanks |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
alan |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Optimists say the glass is half full, |
| 26 |
Pessimists say the glass is half empty, |
| 27 |
Developers say wtf is the glass twice as big as it needs to be? |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Alan McKinnon |
| 30 |
alan at linuxholdings dot co dot za |
| 31 |
+27 82, double three seven, one nine three five |
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives