1 |
On 28/04/2013 17:46, Mick wrote: |
2 |
> On Sunday 28 Apr 2013 14:50:58 Mick wrote: |
3 |
>> On Sunday 28 Apr 2013 13:21:35 Marc Joliet wrote: |
4 |
>>> I have to admit, I'm a bit confused. I was going to suggest rebuilding |
5 |
>>> QtWebKit, because of the undefined references and other warnings above, |
6 |
>>> but I didn't rebuild it myself after upgrading icu, and various KDE |
7 |
>>> software I have (that depends on QtWebKit, for example k3b and various |
8 |
>>> games) still runs fine. |
9 |
>>> |
10 |
>>> I would try rebuilding QtWebKit anyway, though. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> That's fixed it. Thanks! |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Does this mean that the new *default* for make.conf should be that preserve- |
15 |
> libs is included in FEATURES, otherwise packages that depend on older lib |
16 |
> files break if older files are removed? |
17 |
> |
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
I dunno what the default is, but I've used preserve-libs since forever. |
21 |
|
22 |
Not having it doesn't give you less than what you used to have - apps |
23 |
that link to libs which get upgraded always used to break, hence why we |
24 |
had revdep-rebuild. And far years we just dealt with this breakage. |
25 |
|
26 |
preserve-libs just delays the delete of the old lib till the point where |
27 |
nothing uses it anymore. |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
Alan McKinnon |
31 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |