Archives
Archives
| From: | Joseph <syscon@×××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice 2.0 - compiling or binary | ||
| Date: | Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:30:01 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1133360283.10588.3.camel@sysconcept.ca | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice 2.0 - compiling or binary by Uwe Klosa |
||
| 1 | On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 09:00 +0100, Uwe Klosa wrote: |
| 2 | > I have used both versions. The compiled version seems to be more stable on my system. |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > Uwe |
| 5 | |
| 6 | [snip] |
| 7 | |
| 8 | I've compile OO 2.0 without any errors. |
| 9 | But when I just open and save a spreadsheet OO 2.0 crashed on me with |
| 10 | [signal.11]. |
| 11 | Not a good symptom. |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | #Joseph |
| 14 | -- |
| 15 | gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice 2.0 - compiling or binary | Uwe Klosa <uwe.klosa@×××××.se> |