1 |
Daniel Frey <djqfrey@×××××.com> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On 01/17/2016 10:10 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
4 |
>> On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 1:03 PM, J. Roeleveld <joost@××××××××.org> wrote: |
5 |
>>> |
6 |
>>> I would prefer a method that is independent of OS used. And provides server side limitations with regards to filesharing and clipboard access. |
7 |
>>> |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> x2go is just X11, so it should be OS-independent as long as you have a |
10 |
>> client/server for it. It just logs in as the appropriate user on the |
11 |
>> remote host, so access beyond that is whatever you'd get if you just |
12 |
>> logged in on a console. |
13 |
>> |
14 |
>> Now, I can't vouch for how many OSes anybody has bothered to implement it on. |
15 |
>> |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Thanks for that tip on x2go - I'd struggled with freenx and eventually |
18 |
> gave up and freenx isn't even in the tree anymore. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> I looked up x2go and rebuilt openssh on my home server as it suggested |
21 |
> to try it out. Other than restarting sshd, I didn't have to do any |
22 |
> configuration and it just *worked*. I've, like, never ever had that |
23 |
> happen before. Even when I set up my tigervnc with xinetd it was days of |
24 |
> experimenting before I got it to work. tigervnc also was hanging up X |
25 |
> upgrades, so now I can successfully ditch tigervnc. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> x2go is so much faster it's unbelievable. I have a gigabit LAN here at |
28 |
> home and VNC was lagging pretty badly (to the point where I decided |
29 |
> against even trying to use it remotely.) |
30 |
> |
31 |
> Some things to note: there's no android client, but there is one for |
32 |
> Windows/linux/MacOS. I haven't tried it on my Windows laptop yet, but |
33 |
> one of these days I'll dig it out and try it. |
34 |
|
35 |
Thank you for letting us know, I'll keep x2go in mind. |
36 |
|
37 |
> Makes me wonder if it would be possible to spin up a VM on demand with |
38 |
> x2go on and preconfigured if OP requires users not to be on the same host. |
39 |
|
40 |
It probably is; I guess you'd need something to start the VM when a |
41 |
connection is attempted. |