1 |
On 12/24/2010 07:34 AM, Andy Wilkinson wrote: |
2 |
> On 12/19/2010 09:55 PM, Dale wrote: |
3 |
>> Andy Wilkinson wrote: |
4 |
>>> So, the only issue that I consistently have in Gentoo anymore is |
5 |
>>> that there exist periods of time (probably coincident with gphoto2 |
6 |
>>> or gvfs upgrades) wherein I can't automount my PTP digital camera (a |
7 |
>>> Nikon D60, if it's relevant) and use gthumb to import my photos. |
8 |
>>> I'm able to use gphoto2 to do so just fine, and so I do, but it |
9 |
>>> bothers me that the way I'd prefer to do things doesn't work the way |
10 |
>>> I'd like it to. Currently I'm in a "doesn't work" phase, as you may |
11 |
>>> have surmised. |
12 |
>>> |
13 |
>>> To make matters worse, when gvfs/nautilus doesn't see the camera at |
14 |
>>> all, I have no idea at all how to find out what messages might have |
15 |
>>> been sent where, or why gvfs might not be seeing it, or |
16 |
>>> what-have-you. None of the usual suspects (dmesg, |
17 |
>>> /var/log/messages, ~/.xsession-errors) have anything useful. dmesg |
18 |
>>> does at least tell me that I'm seeing the USB device properly. |
19 |
>>> |
20 |
>>> Is there a tried-and-true method of at least troubleshooting this |
21 |
>>> sort of issue, or am I stuck throwing darts at the different gphoto2 |
22 |
>>> and gvfs builds in portage? |
23 |
>>> |
24 |
>>> I've attached emerge --info gvfs gphoto2, for the curious. |
25 |
>>> |
26 |
>>> Thanks, |
27 |
>>> |
28 |
>>> -Andy |
29 |
>> |
30 |
>> Firstly, I don't use Gnome and our cameras are different. This may |
31 |
>> not matter for your setup but thought it worth checking into. I have |
32 |
>> this for my Canon in make.conf: |
33 |
>> |
34 |
>> CAMERAS="canon ptp2" |
35 |
>> |
36 |
>> I use the ptp2 and most likely need to remove the other but you may |
37 |
>> need to set yours to something that your camera uses. CAMERAS="ptp2" |
38 |
>> just may work. |
39 |
>> |
40 |
>> Usually a emerge -pv <package> will show the options available. It |
41 |
>> does here anyway. |
42 |
>> |
43 |
>> Hope that helps. |
44 |
>> |
45 |
>> Dale |
46 |
>> |
47 |
>> :-) :-) |
48 |
> Alas, changing CAMERAS didn't work. But I'm not surprised, as gphoto2 |
49 |
> has always found the camera just fine, regardless of what Gnome |
50 |
> thinks. I suspect that my issue is closer to a libgphoto2/gvfs |
51 |
> incompatibility, but I've no data on which to test that. I suppose I |
52 |
> could just start compiling ~arch masked builds of libgphoto2 and see |
53 |
> if any of them stick, but I would love some sort of cleaner answer. |
54 |
> |
55 |
> Thanks, |
56 |
> |
57 |
> -Andy |
58 |
OK, so I decided to try around with different combinations, and it turns |
59 |
out I actually was running a ~arch version of libgphoto2 (I had unmasked |
60 |
2.4* for compatibility with gthumb-2.12, iirc). Downgrading from |
61 |
libgphoto2-2.4.10 to -2.4.9 fixed things. |
62 |
|
63 |
Why? :) |
64 |
|
65 |
Thanks, |
66 |
|
67 |
-Andy |