| 1 |
On Sun, 27 May 2012 04:29:17 +0000, Joshua Murphy wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Well, given that it's there, it cleans up after itself, and it avoids |
| 4 |
> issues in the instance where /var isn't available early on, is there |
| 5 |
> much reason _not_ to link /var/run and /var/lock over to their |
| 6 |
> respective equivalents on /run? And both with and without /var mounted |
| 7 |
> (so they exist and are writable even if /var doesn't come up)? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I did that months ago to resolve an issue with a specific package that |
| 10 |
hadn't been updated to use /run at the time. I never got round to |
| 11 |
removing the links and it has caused no problems. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Suicidal twin kills sister by mistake! |
Archives