1 |
Am Mittwoch, 15. November 2017, 17:50:37 CET schrieb tuxic@××××××.de: |
2 |
|
3 |
> * Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be |
4 |
> * installed at the same time on the same system. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> (sys-libs/glibc-2.25-r9:2.2/2.2::gentoo, installed) pulled in by |
7 |
> |
8 |
> >=sys-libs/glibc-2.23[multilib?] (>=sys-libs/glibc-2.23) required by |
9 |
> >(dev-java/icedtea-bin-3.6.0:8/8::gentoo, installed) |
10 |
> sys-libs/glibc[rpc(-)] required by (net-fs/autofs-5.1.3:0/0::gentoo, |
11 |
> installed) |
12 |
|
13 |
^ this is the key: autofs needs rpc support in glibc, which is going away with |
14 |
glibc-2.26. |
15 |
|
16 |
Sadly portage is extremely unhelpful here, since - if you look at the autofs |
17 |
ebuild - the problem goes away as soon as you switch its "libtirpc" useflag |
18 |
on: |
19 |
libtirpc? ( net-libs/libtirpc ) |
20 |
!libtirpc? ( sys-libs/glibc[rpc(-)] ) |
21 |
(glibc-2.26 has no rpc useflag, and the (-) means it's treated as if it were |
22 |
switched off then.) |
23 |
|
24 |
Indeed libtirpc is the modern replacement for the obsolete rpc support in |
25 |
glibc. |
26 |
|
27 |
Anyway, I hope with the following commit this is now fixed: |
28 |
|
29 |
commit 43429ba5bdcb0605f81e7ca7442aa085eca31caa |
30 |
Author: Andreas K. Hüttel <dilfridge@g.o> |
31 |
Date: Wed Nov 15 23:37:41 2017 +0100 |
32 |
|
33 |
net-fs/autofs: Switch libtirpc to default to on, causes otherwise ugly |
34 |
blockers with glibc-2.26 |
35 |
|
36 |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.13, Repoman-2.3.4 |
37 |
|
38 |
net-fs/autofs/autofs-5.0.10.ebuild | 4 ++-- |
39 |
net-fs/autofs/autofs-5.0.7-r4.ebuild | 4 ++-- |
40 |
net-fs/autofs/autofs-5.0.7-r5.ebuild | 4 ++-- |
41 |
net-fs/autofs/autofs-5.1.2.ebuild | 2 +- |
42 |
net-fs/autofs/autofs-5.1.3.ebuild | 2 +- |
43 |
5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) |
44 |
|
45 |
|
46 |
|
47 |
|
48 |
-- |
49 |
Andreas K. Hüttel |
50 |
dilfridge@g.o |
51 |
Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice) |