| 1 |
On 29/07/14 14:50, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 29/07/2014 13:45, behrouz khosravi wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Thanks every one. |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> I guess I got it know ! |
| 6 |
>> And I must say that the way Gentoo is working now, is simple, no doubts. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> And I am surprised to hear that Gentoo is so strict to follow upstream. |
| 9 |
>> I guess it makes it the most vanilla flavored, And I really like it ! |
| 10 |
> It also makes the Gentoo dev's life so much easier. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
For sure :) |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> You do not want to get into maintaining custome patchsets for everything |
| 16 |
> under the sun the way Ubuntu and RedHat do it |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
And as a user, I wouldn't want some distribution maintainer messing with |
| 19 |
my packages |
| 20 |
in such a fundamental way (specially if there is an active upstream for it) |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I'd rather be made aware directly if some packages upstream decides to, |
| 23 |
for example, |
| 24 |
remove an feature from it, so I can then make informed decision like |
| 25 |
switch to |
| 26 |
another package |
Archives