1 |
On Sonntag, 2. März 2008, Chuanwen Wu wrote: |
2 |
> In GMN20080218, there is a section: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> EAPI=1 (Where is the specification?): The general agreement was that |
5 |
> any new EAPIs should not be added until EAPI=0 is fully approved. |
6 |
> However, there wasn't any consensus on changing anything about EAPI=1. |
7 |
> Mark Loeser agreed to work on PMS for EAPI=0, and will provide an |
8 |
> update at the next meeting. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> I just don't know what PMS and EAPI means. |
11 |
in gentoo: |
12 |
PMS = Package Manager Specification. |
13 |
|
14 |
What a gentoo package manager has to be able to do, how it does certain steps |
15 |
etc pp. Portage is compatible by definition. |
16 |
|
17 |
EAPI = afaik ebuild api. Current ebuilds are all eapi = 0. If there are |
18 |
incompatible changes to the ebuild structure in the future, this ebuilds will |
19 |
use eapi 1, 2, .... it is mostly a sign for the package manager telling it |
20 |
how to deal with the ebuild. |
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |