Archives
Archives
| From: | Martin Vaeth <martin@×××××.de> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-user] Re: Is perl broken? | ||
| Date: | Mon, 06 Apr 2015 11:29:49 | ||
| Message-Id: | mftqml$2vm$1@ger.gmane.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is perl broken? by "Andreas K. Huettel" |
||
| 1 | Andreas K. Huettel <dilfridge@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | >> Moreover, I didn't check before the rebuild, but after |
| 4 | >> the rebuild there is no 5.20.1 in @INC. |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > Sure about this? |
| 7 | |
| 8 | I checked this, of course. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | But now I realize that the path is *added* to @INC |
| 11 | (even to the perl -V output!) when I re-create it... |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is perl broken? | "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o> |