| 1 |
On Sun, 29 Jan 2017 08:41:59 -0500, |
| 2 |
Responses in line. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> On 29/01/2017 12:11, John Covici wrote: |
| 7 |
> > Hi. I am having a couple of preserved rebuild problems which I have |
| 8 |
> > no idea how to fix. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Ugh. Those problems are horrid to fix |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > The first one is like this: |
| 14 |
> >>>> package: sys-libs/binutils-libs-2.27 |
| 15 |
> > * - /usr/lib64/libbfd-2.25.1.so |
| 16 |
> > * used by |
| 17 |
> > /usr/lib64/binutils/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/2.25.1/libopcodes-2.25.1.so |
| 18 |
> > (sys-devel/binutils-2.25.1-r1) |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> > And no matter how many times I recompile the suggested package(s) it |
| 21 |
> > remains. Why is this happening and how can I fix? |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Let's establish first what portage thinks the problem is. What is the |
| 24 |
> output of |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> ldd /usr/lib64/binutils/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/2.25.1/libopcodes-2.25.1.so |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007fff91936000) |
| 30 |
libbfd-2.25.1.so => /usr/lib64/libbfd-2.25.1.so |
| 31 |
(0x00007fd3deeb7000) |
| 32 |
libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 |
| 33 |
(0x00007fd3deb1e000) |
| 34 |
libz.so.1 => /lib64/libz.so.1 |
| 35 |
(0x00007fd3de906000) |
| 36 |
libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 |
| 37 |
(0x00007fd3de702000) |
| 38 |
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 |
| 39 |
(0x000055f4cd0d2000) |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
> and just for fun |
| 42 |
> |
| 43 |
> ldd /usr/lib64/libbfd-2.25.1.so |
| 44 |
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffeac123000) |
| 45 |
libz.so.1 => /lib64/libz.so.1 (0x00007fbaf1838000) |
| 46 |
libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 |
| 47 |
(0x00007fbaf1634000) |
| 48 |
libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007fbaf129a000) |
| 49 |
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 |
| 50 |
(0x00005643cb966000) |
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
> |
| 53 |
> Plus, what are your USE flags for binutils. |
| 54 |
I seem to have several binutils -- here is what I have: |
| 55 |
Installed versions: 2.25.1-r1(2.25.1)(01:06:59 AM |
| 56 |
01/11/2017)(cxx nls zlib -multitarget -static-libs -test |
| 57 |
-vanilla) 2.26.1(2.26.1)(07:16:43 AM 12/27/2016)(cxx nls |
| 58 |
-multitarget -static-libs -test -vanilla) 2.27(2.27)(07:23:40 AM |
| 59 |
12/27/2016)(cxx nls -multitarget -static-libs -test -vanilla) |
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
> |
| 62 |
> > |
| 63 |
> > Now the second one is more complicated: |
| 64 |
> >>>> package: media-video/ffmpeg-3.2.2 |
| 65 |
> > * - /usr/lib64/libswscale.so.3 |
| 66 |
> > * - /usr/lib64/libswscale.so.3.1.101 |
| 67 |
> > * used by /usr/lib64/gstreamer-0.10/libgstffmpegscale.so |
| 68 |
> > (media-plugins/gst-plugins-ffmpeg-0.10.13_p201211-r3) |
| 69 |
> > * - /usr/lib64/libpostproc.so.53 |
| 70 |
> > * - /usr/lib64/libpostproc.so.53.3.100 |
| 71 |
> > * used by /usr/lib64/gstreamer-0.10/libgstpostproc.so |
| 72 |
> > (media-plugins/gst-plugins-ffmpeg-0.10.13_p201211-r3) |
| 73 |
> > * - /usr/lib64/libavcodec.so.56 |
| 74 |
> > * - /usr/lib64/libavcodec.so.56.60.100 |
| 75 |
> > * used by /usr/lib64/gstreamer-0.10/libgstffmpeg.so |
| 76 |
> > (media-plugins/gst-plugins-ffmpeg-0.10.13_p201211-r3) |
| 77 |
> > * used by /usr/lib64/gstreamer-0.10/libgstpostproc.so |
| 78 |
> > (media-plugins/gst-plugins-ffmpeg-0.10.13_p201211-r3) |
| 79 |
> > * - /usr/lib64/libavformat.so.56 |
| 80 |
> > * - /usr/lib64/libavformat.so.56.40.101 |
| 81 |
> > * used by /usr/lib64/gstreamer-0.10/libgstffmpeg.so |
| 82 |
> > (media-plugins/gst-plugins-ffmpeg-0.10.13_p201211-r3) |
| 83 |
> > * - /usr/lib64/libavutil.so.54 |
| 84 |
> > * - /usr/lib64/libavutil.so.54.31.100 |
| 85 |
> > * used by |
| 86 |
> > /usr/lib64/gstreamer-0.10/libgstffmpeg.so |
| 87 |
> > (media-plugins/gst-plugins-ffmpeg-0.10.13_p201211-r3) |
| 88 |
> > * used by |
| 89 |
> > /usr/lib64/gstreamer-0.10/libgstffmpegscale.so |
| 90 |
> > (media-plugins/gst-plugins-ffmpeg-0.10.13_p201211-r3) |
| 91 |
> > * used by |
| 92 |
> > /usr/lib64/gstreamer-0.10/libgstpostproc.so |
| 93 |
> > (media-plugins/gst-plugins-ffmpeg-0.10.13_p201211-r3) |
| 94 |
> > * - /usr/lib64/libswresample.so.1 |
| 95 |
> > * - /usr/lib64/libswresample.so.1.2.101 |
| 96 |
> > |
| 97 |
> > Now when I try to recompile it wants to upgrade, but the upgrade does |
| 98 |
> > not emerge and there are so many depricated warnings and errors that I |
| 99 |
> > have a link to the build log instead |
| 100 |
> > |
| 101 |
> > https://covici.com/owncloud/index.php/s/LOysHMSxcFDfLDD |
| 102 |
> > |
| 103 |
> > There is no ebuild for the original version in the tree, so I am |
| 104 |
> > stumped here. |
| 105 |
> |
| 106 |
> This one rings a bell but I can't recall exactly what. |
| 107 |
> |
| 108 |
> I have several times in the past resolved these by brute force, |
| 109 |
> unmerging the problem package and the thing it depends or or links to, |
| 110 |
> then rebuilding both. |
| 111 |
> |
| 112 |
> Are you by chance running a mixed stable/testing system here? |
| 113 |
> |
| 114 |
|
| 115 |
No, just testing. I could unmerge and re-emerge ffmpeg, but not the |
| 116 |
plugin. |
| 117 |
|
| 118 |
|
| 119 |
-- |
| 120 |
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: |
| 121 |
How do |
| 122 |
you spend it? |
| 123 |
|
| 124 |
John Covici |
| 125 |
covici@××××××××××.com |
Archives