1 |
On 05/05 11:22, Matt Connell (Gmail) wrote: |
2 |
> On 2020-05-05 10:38, tuxic@××××××.de wrote: |
3 |
> > Is Firefox/Waterfox able to interface with jackd? |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Disclaimer, I do not use Jack. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Firefox builds, in my personal experience, are intended to be used with |
8 |
> pulseaudio and only pulseaudio. Some people have made some shims for making |
9 |
> it worth with alsa, but they don't look sustainable. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> As the other poster said, this endeavor is likely to result in frustration. |
12 |
> You may get it to 'work' for some value of that word, but depending on |
13 |
> expectations, it may not be worth your while. |
14 |
> |
15 |
|
16 |
HI all, |
17 |
|
18 |
thanks for the repsonse. |
19 |
|
20 |
I am using waterfox, which is not in portage. The mentioning of |
21 |
Forefox was onlu to make its heritage clear. |
22 |
|
23 |
I already have some "experiences" make, when it comes to other things |
24 |
for audio than alsa. |
25 |
|
26 |
Background to my question: |
27 |
I am still searching for a equalizer solution, which does not |
28 |
uses the eq provided by the hardware (I am using a DAC, which |
29 |
does nothing else, than converting PCM into an analog signal. |
30 |
No processing whatsoever. |
31 |
|
32 |
So the eq has to have some sort of DSP funktionality build in. |
33 |
|
34 |
And it should be made for background processing. |
35 |
|
36 |
Anu helpful alsa-based idea is very appreciated... |
37 |
|
38 |
Cheers! |
39 |
Meino |