| 1 |
On 170419-00:51+0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tuesday 18 Apr 2017 17:04:16 Miroslav Rovis wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On 170418-09:17+0000, J. Roeleveld wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > If you are certain you don't have gcc in slot 5.x installed. You can |
| 5 |
> > > add palemoon to /etc/portage/package.unmask |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > "If" is what I would start with. Because it's hard to believe. Possible, |
| 8 |
> > but I'd be more believing if I saw 'emerge --info' and 'gcc-config -l' |
| 9 |
> > of that machine in that time. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> peak ~ # gcc-config -l |
| 12 |
> [1] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.9.4 * |
| 13 |
> peak ~ # |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> I say again: I have just the one version of GCC installed. And it isn't 5.x |
| 16 |
> either. Why is that hard to accept? |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> -- |
| 19 |
> Regards |
| 20 |
> Peter |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
If you don't want to read the analysis below, here's the summary: I |
| 23 |
received your message, with the info missing in your earlier messages, |
| 24 |
only later, because I replied to the same message to which your message |
| 25 |
containing the missing info, just 8 minutes after you replied... Sorry |
| 26 |
anyway! |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
--- |
| 29 |
WARNING: below is probably superfluous, it's mail timestamps and such... |
| 30 |
Reader freely skip all! |
| 31 |
--- |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
I'm sorry for the confusion. But see below if it was my fault. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
If I had gotten your message: |
| 36 |
Message-ID: <2085829.vpf8hVLQL8@peak> |
| 37 |
https://lists.gt.net/gentoo/user/325462#325462 |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
which was actually in reply to the same email: |
| 40 |
Message-ID: <D90E68BF-08F6-4E71-9B55-E2CB68A9FA54@××××××××.org> |
| 41 |
https://lists.gt.net/gentoo/user/325446#325446 |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
( |
| 44 |
I checked marc.info archives as well, and changing the subject really |
| 45 |
splits the thread... Not good! Lurker would have done better service |
| 46 |
here... (Lurker not even available in Gentoo. I think Lurker available |
| 47 |
only in Debian/Devuan and their family...) |
| 48 |
) |
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
[which was actually in reply to the same email] to which my message |
| 51 |
(which you partly quote above) was in reply to, but... |
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
...But which message of mine appears later in the thread (in my Mutt, or |
| 54 |
likely in whatever UAs other subscribers use) as well as in the web (I |
| 55 |
changed the subject, but the number is incremented by 6, pretty |
| 56 |
obviously some consecutive serial increment, by arrival [1]): |
| 57 |
https://lists.gt.net/gentoo/user/325468#325468 |
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
If I had gotten that message of yours with an equivalent of the info |
| 60 |
that I wished to see when I mentioned 'gcc-config': |
| 61 |
|
| 62 |
I would not have doubted your claims in the very least. |
| 63 |
|
| 64 |
However: |
| 65 |
|
| 66 |
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 15:56:12 +0100 |
| 67 |
From: Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××.uk> |
| 68 |
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
| 69 |
|
| 70 |
and: |
| 71 |
|
| 72 |
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 17:04:16 +0200 |
| 73 |
From: Miroslav Rovis <miro.rovis@××××××××××××××.hr> |
| 74 |
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
| 75 |
|
| 76 |
and that's only 8 minutes later, that I sent my message, unaware of your |
| 77 |
reply. |
| 78 |
|
| 79 |
How could I have known that you had already replied in regard... |
| 80 |
|
| 81 |
Sorry, anyway. |
| 82 |
--- |
| 83 |
[1] And it also shows, in the message headers, that my message was |
| 84 |
delivered by my provider, not the hoster of croatiafidelis.hr, they do |
| 85 |
a good job, and they use Exim server... Not them, they sent fine, but by |
| 86 |
the provider, they're on some Microsoft server, erhm, erhm... [my |
| 87 |
message was delivered on by my provider] some 40 minutes later only... |
| 88 |
Else it would have had the serial just incremented by 1 and not 6 in |
| 89 |
respect to your message, if it wasn't stalled for who knows what reason |
| 90 |
at my provider's. |
| 91 |
-- |
| 92 |
Miroslav Rovis |
| 93 |
Zagreb, Croatia |
| 94 |
https://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr |
Archives