| 1 |
On Tuesday 29 June 2010 15:38:05 Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 16:23:48 +0200, Alex Schuster wrote: |
| 3 |
> > I tried chromium once, about half a year ago, but it crashed instantly. |
| 4 |
> > Emerging it again. But I like Konqueror very much. It has problems with |
| 5 |
> > some web sites, for those I use Firefox. I am missing some of Firefox' |
| 6 |
> > plugins, and it works much better with the new flash, but over all I |
| 7 |
> > like Konqueror's behaviour better. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I used to be a big Konqueror fan until about six months ago. Then I |
| 10 |
> tried Chromium and was blown away by its speed and the way it works on |
| 11 |
> more sites. I do miss some of the integration of Konqueror and its |
| 12 |
> kio-slaves and still use it for non-web duties. When the inevitable |
| 13 |
> feature creep hits Chromium and it slows down, can see myself going back |
| 14 |
> to Konqueror. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I tried Chromium six months ago and it was not crashing, but couldn't really |
| 17 |
tell the difference in speed from Opera for most sites. In terms of |
| 18 |
performance it is Opera, FF, Konqueror here, with Konqueror not managing some |
| 19 |
Javascripts at all. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Alex, have you tried turning off the Nepomuke service? I see in one of your |
| 22 |
screenshots that you are having problems with it (segfaults). |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Regards, |
| 25 |
Mick |
Archives