1 |
On Saturday 24 Aug 2013 12:14:14 Bruce Hill wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 10:40:25AM +0100, Mick wrote: |
3 |
> > Hi All, |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > I'm about to compile a new kernel and running oldconfig brings up this |
6 |
> > new set of options. There is no help available, grep-ping through the |
7 |
> > Documentation wasn't particularly revealing and I haven't found anything |
8 |
> > in Google to help me decide what I need/want out of the three: |
9 |
> > =================================================== |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > * CPU/Task time and stats accounting |
12 |
> > * |
13 |
> > Cputime accounting |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > 1. Simple tick based cputime accounting (TICK_CPU_ACCOUNTING) |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > > 2. Full dynticks CPU time accounting (VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN) (NEW) |
18 |
> > > |
19 |
> > 3. Fine granularity task level IRQ time accounting |
20 |
> > (IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING) |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> > choice[1-3]: ? |
23 |
> > |
24 |
> > There is no help available for this option. |
25 |
> > Prompt: Cputime accounting |
26 |
> > |
27 |
> > Location: |
28 |
> > -> General setup |
29 |
> > |
30 |
> > -> CPU/Task time and stats accounting |
31 |
> > |
32 |
> > Defined at init/Kconfig:297 |
33 |
> > Selected by: m |
34 |
> > |
35 |
> > =================================================== |
36 |
> > |
37 |
> > Option 2 seems to have been selected by default, but I am not sure if |
38 |
> > this is right for a laptop. |
39 |
> > |
40 |
> > What have you chosen and why? |
41 |
> |
42 |
> Each of the three options has it's own individual help. |
43 |
|
44 |
Oops! Thanks for pointing this out and sorry for the noise ... I had only |
45 |
tried "?" instead of "<option_number> ?" |
46 |
|
47 |
Help is also visible and available when using menuconfig. |
48 |
|
49 |
The 2nd option is best for my needs. |
50 |
-- |
51 |
Regards, |
52 |
Mick |