| 1 |
On 14/02/2015 16:11, Peter Humphrey wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Saturday 14 February 2015 11:53:23 Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Your use of -- to supply extra arguments to emerge. It means you may |
| 5 |
>> be using unsupported options so if it breaks, the pieces are all |
| 6 |
>> yours. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Yes, I can read the words, Neil ;-) I just want to know whether it's |
| 9 |
> safe to ignore the warning even when issued with such vigour. As I said, |
| 10 |
> I can't see anything dangerous in the arguments I pass in the alias. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Those should be safe, none of your selected options change the final output. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Personally, I think the warning is going a tad overboard, but hey to |
| 17 |
each dev his own |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Alan McKinnon |
| 22 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
Archives