Archives
Archives
| From: | Martin Vaeth <martin@×××××.de> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-user] Re: tmp on tmpfs | ||
| Date: | Thu, 25 May 2017 15:46:56 | ||
| Message-Id: | slrnoidv2o.udl.martin@lounge.imp.fu-berlin.de | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: tmp on tmpfs by Mick |
||
| 1 | Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 | > Do either of these reduce the effect of (spinning) drive thrashing and |
| 3 | > desktop latency increasing when swapping takes place? |
| 4 | |
| 5 | I never made any benchmarks. I just heard that some people are using |
| 6 | the combination of both to avoid swap altogether (or only have an |
| 7 | fallback swap which is used only in emergency situations although |
| 8 | swappiness values are kept normal). |