| 1 |
On Monday 10 Apr 2017 11:08:05 Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 17:13:28 +0800, Andrew Lowe wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Do we have any clang users out there? I've had clang installed |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > on my machine for ages and a simple "clang test.c" will result in an |
| 6 |
> > executable. I can even nearly build my whole machine using clang, so |
| 7 |
> > its up and running. I've now just updated clang, from a working 3.9.1 |
| 8 |
> > to a 4.0.0-r1 and clang has now disappeared. If I type in "clang |
| 9 |
> > --version", I get "command not found". "whereis clang" only gives me |
| 10 |
> > the library dir. Doing "ls -la /usr/bin/cla*" gives me "No such file or |
| 11 |
> > directory" |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Try "qlist clang" so see what is installed, "qlist clang | grep bin/" |
| 14 |
> should find the executables. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> qlist is part of portage-utils, which you probably already have. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I seem to recall clang clashing recently with some package, which required the |
| 19 |
clang USE flag to be unset - was it llvm? I suspect as a result clang is no |
| 20 |
longer installed on my laptop. |
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Regards, |
| 23 |
Mick |
Archives